claurent

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 788 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Publisher not identified #37114
    claurent
    Participant

    I would say that the name "Houghton Mifflin Harcourt" on the back left bottom of the cover is the publisher name (which also agrees with the HMH in the title). I do not see a city/state to apply to that, so I would use the Orlando, Florida address in the copyright info.  You could also say there is no city/state associated with the publisher name and leave that area blank.

    Cindi

    in reply to: Publisher not identified #37103
    claurent
    Participant

    The publisher is often listed on the front or back cover the book or on a separate page from the copyright page (maybe with the title of the book and the author info on it).  In this case, it is pretty obvious to me that Houghton Mifflin Harcourt is the publisher - one of the covers may have the city.  If the covers don't have any information, you could use the Orlando, Florida address as the city/state.

    Cindi

    in reply to: Dot locator for “Mention” with Print Symbols #37100
    claurent
    Participant

    My other contact got back to me (I actually checked with three other people) and here is the consensus:

    The dot locator for mention is designed for use in situations where the braille cell itself is under discussion. We do not employ the dot locator for mention for symbols (like letters, punctuation, math operators, shapes, etc.) that happen to be on their own within the flow of text.

    Cindi
    in reply to: Side bar references middle of list #37099
    claurent
    Participant

    Or between C and D - I do think it should be before or after the entirety of part C.  You do have some interesting situations with this book!

    Cindi

    in reply to: Dot locator for “Mention” with Print Symbols #37095
    claurent
    Participant

    I have not forgotten this question - I'm consulting with others. I'll be as quick as I can with an answer!

    Cindi

    in reply to: Shapes around problem, answer, step numbers #37094
    claurent
    Participant

    I agree with the way you handled the question and answer problems - putting in a TN that they are just simple numbers and letters followed by a period in braille makes perfect sense. As for the Step It Out arrows - are the arrows necessary? I assume every Step It Out is preceded by the heading - so it is pretty clear that's what it is.  You could just put in the number and NOT follow it by a period - and put that in the TN.  Or enclose those numbers in parentheses.  This would use more "familiar" symbols.  The way you chose certainly isn't wrong as BF does not directly address this issue that frequently occurs in print.  Choose a way and then be consistent.  The reader will understand.  What a challenge you have!

    Cindi

    in reply to: Glossaries with Samples In Math #37088
    claurent
    Participant

    I've checked with a couple of people who work on the BANA math and chemistry committees.  We all agree this is a very sticky issue!  Here is one suggestion for guide text - recognizing that we don't know where your page will split:

    _% .a-amino-#3 _:,-,alprazolam

    You will have to significantly shorten the words to be used as guide text - and you will have to get very creative I think.  If you want to let me know exactly which words are the guide text, I can offer some suggestions that are more specific.  For instance, here are a couple of shortened options:

    _% .a1-agon _:,-

    _% .a1-antag _:,-

    Cindi

     

     

    • This reply was modified 3 years, 7 months ago by claurent.
    • This reply was modified 3 years, 7 months ago by claurent.
    in reply to: Color coding and pseudo-icons #37087
    claurent
    Participant

    I think your suggested way of handling this (with the transcriber-defined shape indicators for both occurences) is brilliant!

    Cindi

    in reply to: Glossaries with Samples In Math #37076
    claurent
    Participant

    Can you send a scan of one of the pages? It's easier to answer when I can see what you are specifically talking about.

    Cindi

    in reply to: Glossaries with Samples In Math #37066
    claurent
    Participant

    Yes, an entry can be split across braille pages (both of your examples are ok).  Don't forget that a glossary needs guide words (which I think I see, but want to be sure!)

    Cindi

    in reply to: Glossaries with Samples In Math #37052
    claurent
    Participant

    This is indeed a glossary with samples and should be transcribed according to the rules of Section 21.6.5 of Braille Formats.  Entry words will be in cell 5. The entry word includes the pronunciation. If you prefer, the Spanish entry word could be a separate cell 5 heading - but it could also just continue after the pronunciation of the English entry word.  Personally, I would then make the definitions blocked paragraphs with Example as a cell 7 heading and the diagrams or equations following that.  Another option would be to make the definitions 1-5 with the Examples 3-5 (and then the diagrams or displayed equations in the appropriate formats).

    Cindi

    in reply to: Embedded Footnotes #37013
    claurent
    Participant

    Jan - I'm sorry for the late reply - it got buried somehow in my email!  I am still not sure what you mean. If they are endnotes, they appear at the end of the chapter or at the end of the book and are placed all together as stated in section 16.9 of BF (either at the end of the chapter, at the end of the book, or in a separate volume.

    Cindi

    in reply to: Embedded Footnotes #36950
    claurent
    Participant

    I'm not sure what an embedded footnote is - can you send a picture?  All footnotes (except gloss notes in Foreign Language) are at the end of the print page in braille.

    Cindi

    in reply to: Blank line clarification #36887
    claurent
    Participant

    According to BF 1.9, a blank line is not required preceding a paragraph; according to BF section 6, a blank line is not required following a 7-5 transcriber's note with description and/or caption. In the example you sent, the one without the blank line is correct.

    Cindi

    in reply to: Omissions #36877
    claurent
    Participant

    Sorry - I see now that this information was in your original email.  I am not an expert on UEB Technical, but it seems you should be using the symbols in section 3.6 of the Guidelines for Technical Materials...there is a visible space symbol used for an omission that has no print symbol (dots 346).  I do not believe the three dot 5s would be appropriate here.  I would also suggest you post this in the UEB Math forum for confirmation.

    Cindi

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 788 total)