Julie Sumwalt

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 157 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Headings with Boxes #29307
    Julie Sumwalt
    Participant

    Hi Cindy,

    This would be a good question for the Formats forum. Please repost your query there.

    Braille on,

    Julie

    in reply to: Breaking Lists -Willie Sitton #29299
    Julie Sumwalt
    Participant

    Hi,

    I am going to punt this one over to the Formats forum. Please repost your question there.

    Thanks,

    Julie

    in reply to: Page numbers with letters #29282
    Julie Sumwalt
    Participant

    Hi Cindy,

    Thank you for the image. It was very helpful. UEB does not make a distinction between acronyms and abbreviations when considering contraction usage, only between how they are pronounced. See UEB 10.12.1 and 10.12.2. So we need to decide if OFF would be pronounced as "off" or "O-F-F." Since this is about Office 2013, and "office" uses the OF contraction, I would pronounce it as "off" and use the OF contraction.

    Braille on,

    Julie

    in reply to: Superscript numbers before letters #29279
    Julie Sumwalt
    Participant

    Hi Abby,

    No, there is not a baseline indicator in UEB. The superscript indicator only affects the next item. The definition of an item is found in Guidelines for Technical Material (GTM) 12.1. You can find examples of left-displaced superscripts and subscripts in GTM 7.8.

    Braille on,

    Julie

    in reply to: Capital Letter Passage Indicator #29243
    Julie Sumwalt
    Participant

    Hi Cynthia,

    There is no hard rule about this situation, but we are in agreement with you in treating the credentials as a passage. Great question!

    Julie

     

     

    in reply to: Plural and short form word #29230
    Julie Sumwalt
    Participant

    Hi Tung,

    You are correct. CDs does not need the grade 1 symbol indicator because CD is not standing alone any more with the s after it (2.6). It does, however, require the capitals terminator before the s because the capital word indicator carries through letters unless it is explicitly stopped (8.4.1).

    That said, CD's is the opposite. Now a grade 1 symbol (not word) (10.9.5) indicator is needed because CD is standing alone (2.6.4). The apostrophe stops capitals mode (8.4.2) so a capitals terminator is not needed.

    Braille on,

    Julie

    • This reply was modified 7 years, 8 months ago by Julie Sumwalt.
    in reply to: Arrows, bar over #29173
    Julie Sumwalt
    Participant

    Glad to hear it!

    Julie

    in reply to: Arrows, bar over #29138
    Julie Sumwalt
    Participant

    Hi Fred,

    I can see you've put a lot of thought into this. There are reasons why the symbols are the way they are, however. Please see my comments in the attachment.

    Regards,

    Julie

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    in reply to: typeform terminator #29137
    Julie Sumwalt
    Participant

    Hi,

    There are two symbols-sequences: "3-D" and "printer". You need the bold word indicator in front of each of these sequences. Only a space or terminator stops the bold word effect, so, yes, you need a bold terminator after "printer".

    Standing alone has to do with contraction usage, not typeforms. With typeforms, you are focusing on symbols-sequences. For instance, "in" in "father-in-law" is standing alone because there is a dash on either side of it. You can use the contraction for "in". The entire compound word, however, only needs one italic word indicator in front of it if the whole thing is italicized. If only "in" were italicized, then you would need the italic terminator after "in" to prevent "law" from also being italicized.

    Braille on,

    Julie

    in reply to: Arrows, bar over #29085
    Julie Sumwalt
    Participant

    Hi Fred,

    I had to go to the top for this one! Please see the attachment.

    Braille on,

    Julie

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    in reply to: If … then #29064
    Julie Sumwalt
    Participant

    Hi Mike,

    In this case, the ellipsis represents symbols-sequences that would likely be italicized as well, so treating this as a passage makes sense.

    Regards,

    Julie

    in reply to: Asterisk attached to italicized work #28998
    Julie Sumwalt
    Participant

    Hi Mike,

    Follow print as much as possible. If you can tell that the emphasis does not carry through the asterisk (or number or letter superscript), then a terminator would be required. If you can tell that the emphasis does carry through asterisk (or number or letter superscript), then no terminator is needed. If in doubt, choose one way or the other and be consistent.

    Regards,

    Julie

    in reply to: QuickPay #28976
    Julie Sumwalt
    Participant

    Hi Greta,

    Right, the capital indicator after Quick cancels its standing alone status and signifies the start of a new word. "QuickPay" is two unspaced words. "Quickpay" is one word and according to UEB 10.9.3c the shortform could be used.

    Braille on,

    Julie

    in reply to: Numeric Space in a Licence Plate Number #28968
    Julie Sumwalt
    Participant

    Hello,

    Glad you asked! Each symbols-sequence needs to be italicized separately. The numeric space indicator is only used for numeric segments of a single number. It isn't meant to keep symbols-sequences together in general. It would not be appropriate here because the letters GMT do not represent numbers.

    Braille on,

    Julie

    in reply to: superscript letters #28854
    Julie Sumwalt
    Participant

    Hi Greta,

    You got it! That's exactly right.

    Braille on,

    Julie

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 157 total)