Lindy Walton

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 388 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chemistry letter indicator #21459
    Lindy Walton
    Moderator

    Hi, this is Betty replying instead of Lindy.
    See Rule VIII, Section 51 of the Nemeth Braille Code. Since the abbreviation, m, is not followed by a period (that applies to it)it must be preceded by the English-letter indicator (dots 56). The same applies to the abbreviation, g, for grams. Even when a superscript is applied to the abbreviation, you must still use the letter indicator.
    See also Rule IX, Section 55c.ii. for the use of contractions to, into, and by with abbreviations.
    Hope this clarifies your questions.
    Betty

    in reply to: Chemistry letter indicator #21458
    Lindy Walton
    Moderator

    Hi Lindy, I've some questions about Nemeth with dots 56.
    If I've m/cm2 (2 = superscript) does the letter m takes dots 56?
    If I've m/cm does the letter m takes dots 56?
    If I've m/m2 (2 = superscript) Do the two letters m take dots 56?
    If I've this sentence: change it to g/cm, do I uncontracted the to? Does the letter g takes dots 56?
    If I've 3 m+7 m Does the first m takes dots 56 before the mathematical sign?

    Thanks and have a good day!

    in reply to: glossary in math book #21490
    Lindy Walton
    Moderator

    Ok, Lindy. Thanks!

    in reply to: glossary in math book #21489
    Lindy Walton
    Moderator

    Good question! This is a question for the Braille Formats chair. I interpret this to mean the entire Glossary section, but I understand your uncertainty and hesitation to apply this in this manner. I will post your question under the Braille Formats forum. Watch for a reply there.

    in reply to: Chemistry Abbreviations #21485
    Lindy Walton
    Moderator

    Regarding Section 9.1, General Rules ... If the abbreviation/acronym has chemical meaning (such as DNA) then follow the rule stated in the Chemistry Code. If the abbreviation/acronym does not have to do with chemistry (such as ISBN), follow Nemeth Code rules. If in doubt, I would recommend following Chemistry Code. Your list makes sense to me -- the first half can be double-capped and punctuated in the literary mode; the second list should be individually capitalized and punctuated mathematically. Keep track of your decisions so your transcription is consistent.
    For new readers: be sure to read further in Section 9 to see how the Chemistry Code differs from the Nemeth Code regarding physical states (9.2), SI units of measurement (9.3), chemical groups (9.4), and concentration of solutions (9.5).

    in reply to: multipurpose indicator dot 5 #21464
    Lindy Walton
    Moderator

    Yes, if the closing parenthesis is at the base-line of writing, which I assume it is, you must return the reader to the base-line by brailling a base-line indicator (dot 5) before the parenthesis. Section 73 of the Nemeth Code describes this concept.

    in reply to: multipurpose indicator dot 5 #21463
    Lindy Walton
    Moderator

    Thanks Lindy! Have another question for you if I have
    (Ka) the letter a is in superscript do I add the dot 5 after the letter a just before the end parenthesis.
    The duxbury braille translator put a dot 5 before the parenthesis.
    Thanks and have a good day!
    Bye! Bye!

    in reply to: Chemistry letter indicator #21457
    Lindy Walton
    Moderator

    I neglected to mention that --in this case-- S is the abbreviation for "sinister" which means "situated to the left" in this context.

    in reply to: icons #21451
    Lindy Walton
    Moderator

    It is important to include the icons in your transcription. You may use either method shown in the new Formats guidelines -- devise shape symbols for the icons, or provide a written description each time. If you devise shape symbols, be sure to follow the warning in Section 107 of the Nemeth code -- that is, don't use letters that already carry a meaning in the Basic Shapes section (106), and contractions may not be used.

    in reply to: Euro #21439
    Lindy Walton
    Moderator

    Good question. Context and spacing will make it clear which symbol (4, 15) represents, and no rules say that we must list or define the Euro symbol, or --for that matter-- any other symbol that the Nemeth code shares with other codes. However, you certainly can use your judgment here: If the Euro symbol appears rarely in this transcription, you may insert a transcriber's note at that location, defining the symbol. If the Euro symbol appears throughout the volume, although EBAE does not include the Euro as a symbol required to be listed and defined on the Special Symbols page, there is no harm done if you want to list it.

    in reply to: Is a NI needed? #21440
    Lindy Walton
    Moderator

    Here is another case where it is better to understand the rules instead of searching for an example that fits the question. The rule you are looking for is Rule II, Sec.11.e which sends you back to sections 9 to see if any of the "Use of the Numeric Indicator" rules apply.
    a: Is the numeral at the beginning of a braille line or after a space? No.

    b: Is the numeral following a punctuation mark? No.

    c-g do not apply here.

    Section 9a is the rule to understand. In essence, a numeric indicator is not needed here because the numeral is not preceded by a space (in braille).

    in reply to: Cancellation with Complex Fractions #21424
    Lindy Walton
    Moderator

    Your transcription of this complex fraction is fine. Although, technically, the denominator also contains a complex fraction, your interpretation makes sense. It reads easily and follows the rules of cancellation and single-letter abbreviations. I do notice that there is room on the line to include the second link (= 5 s) on the same line as the anchor.

    in reply to: Identifier in spatial arrangement #21426
    Lindy Walton
    Moderator

    I always go to the Nemeth Codebook first with a question -- the more familiar you are with this resource, the more flexible you will be in applying the rules when no illustrative examples are given. In this case, however, there is a good illustration of what I believe you are asking.

    Rule XXV of the Nemeth Code discusses format of spatial arrangements.
    Section 192 of that rule discusses margins for spatial itemized materials.
    Subsection "b" offers an optional format for space-saving purposes, with main divisions and subdivisions that will answer your question. (Page 200)

    in reply to: Mendeleev’s Table #21425
    Lindy Walton
    Moderator

    Since the text mentions "chart" and "pattern" you should retain the print layout, as four columns of 14 rows. Use dot 5s to fill in the empty entries, using the full width of each column. (Column 4 has no empty entries.) Use the full cell for the question mark. You can adapt the wide table as either a foldout or divide it vertically. A TN can explain the smaller numbers after the (unspaced) commas.

    in reply to: Multiple Spatial Equations #21423
    Lindy Walton
    Moderator

    I suggest using the first method of each of the examples you have brailled. The horizontal spacing (which matches print spacing) makes the vertical arrangements more obvious, both to the braille reader and to the sighted teacher, aid, or parent who may be helping the student. I think this transcription is clear and easy to read. Nicely done.

Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 388 total)